PUMA: Prospecting the Urban Mines of Amsterdam | Knowledge Hub | Circle Economy Foundation
imageimage
image
Article / Report
PUMA: Prospecting the Urban Mines of Amsterdam
0
0

The majority of metals are consumed within the construction sector. Metals are not only difficult to extract from the ground, but are also more easily recyclable, making the metals in buildings a prime target for recycling. Although these metals - the "urban mine" - are used widely, their recycling is not very systematic. The PUMA project has successfully researched the prevalence of three metals (copper, iron, and aluminium) in Amsterdam, and created a geological map (urban mining database) of urban mining potentials in the city. This helps the wider implementation of urban mining, and has inspired similar studies in Utrecht and Amersfoort.

Problem

Buildings contain 50% or possibly more of all metals in use, a material that is in theory 100% recyclable. While recycling rates are relatively high due to the high value of metals, it is done in an unsystematic way and often reliant on assumptions that are not empirically validated. This makes it harder for Amsterdam to implement effective wider policies concerning urban mining, and makes existing initiatives less effective.

Solution

The AMS research institute partnered with multiple Dutch universities and research institute to map the urban mining potential of Amsterdam in a way that would allow for more targeted and more effective urban mining, and validate the assumptions behind urban mining. The research project created a methodology to estimate metal contents in buildings and validated it by real-life site visits. Then, they produced a geological map showing available materials in Amsterdam.

Outcome

The conclusion of the study were five-fold:

1. Buildings before 1900 were found to not include steel in the load-bearing structure

2. Apartments smaller than 75m2 were found not to have a separate toilet and bathroom, instead the toilet was present in the bathroom

3. Recently completed buildings were found not to be included in the database

4. Some buildings with a non-residential function were found to (temporarily) accommodate a residential function

5. Some buildings were found to use electric cooking appliances rather than gas

Additional information

Photo by ThisisEngineering RAEng on Unsplash

Relevant links